Calls Grow to Ban Unlicensed Gambling Sponsorship in Premier

Premier League clubs face increasing calls to end sponsorship deals with gambling operators unlicensed in the UK, as the Independent Football Regulator (IFR) reviews its licensing framework for English football.

This season, several Premier League clubs, including Everton, Sunderland, Fulham, Bournemouth, and Burnley, have front-of-shirt sponsorship agreements with gambling companies that do not hold UK licences. Moreover, 18 of the 20 top-flight clubs have displayed advertising for unlicensed operators on stadium LED boards, exposing fans and bettors to promotions from companies operating outside UK regulatory oversight.

For players and consumers, betting with unlicensed operators carries significant risks. Under section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005, operators without a UK licence commit a criminal offence if they accept bets from British customers. These companies typically lack the consumer protections and responsible gambling safeguards mandated by the UK Gambling Commission, increasing the potential for harm and reducing avenues for dispute resolution.

The Premier League has announced a voluntary ban on front-of-shirt gambling sponsorships starting next season. However, this policy does not address the wider problem of unlicensed operators sponsoring clubs or advertising at grounds, which supports an unregulated market estimated to generate a34.3 billion annually in Britain, according to the Betting and Gaming Council.

Entain, the global sports betting company owning Ladbrokes and Coral, has formally urged the IFR to clarify its licensing guidance to explicitly prohibit clubs from engaging in commercial deals with unlicensed gambling companies. Entain’s chief executive highlighted the connection between unlicensed gambling and sports piracy, which threatens the Premier League’s lucrative broadcast model that funds clubs. The combined UK TV rights deals are worth approximately a36.7 billion of the total a312 billion.

Players should be cautious when considering bets with unlicensed operators, as these companies often lack legal recourse mechanisms, have weaker protections against unfair practices, and provide limited access to responsible gambling tools. The visibility of unlicensed gambling sponsorships in football may also normalize betting with these operators, potentially exposing vulnerable individuals to unsafe gambling environments.

The IFR is currently consulting on a club licensing regime covering the top five tiers of English men’s football, from the Premier League down to the National League. Its draft licensing code prohibits clubs from accepting income “connected to serious criminal conduct,” and Entain is seeking confirmation that this includes gambling companies operating without a UK licence.

While the IFR has not commented publicly, sources indicate it will consider all submissions carefully as part of the consultation process. A clear stance against unlicensed gambling sponsorship would strengthen player protections and help curb the influence of illegal gambling within English football.

For bettors and consumers, these developments highlight the importance of choosing operators licensed and regulated by the UK Gambling Commission. Licensed operators must comply with strict rules designed to protect players, including measures to prevent gambling harm and ensure fair play.

For more information on player protection and regulation in UK sports betting, visit GamblingNews.today UK and Player Protection. Updates on sports betting rules and licensing can be found at Regulation.

Related coverage on gambling regulation and public health concerns in the US is available at Gambling | The Guardian.

Source: Gambling | The Guardian.

David Rossi